Is it just a romantic, anti-science notion to ditch agrichemicals,
GMOs, monocultures and patents? Or, is
it a necessity?
This is the story of how small-holders become trapped by
addiction to pesticides, and how two villages in India got clean.
Agrichemical corporations and their local dealers had no
difficulty ensnaring Indian farmers.
Once the first 'high' of a booming cotton crop and ensuing wealth had
been experienced, farmers came straight back for more: more GM seeds, more
fertilizer and more pesticides. The
dealers also supplied credit, information and advice about their products, and
guaranteed purchase of the crop.
Land-use and skills were diverted into high-tech cotton production, and
pesticides purchased for cotton were applied also to the dwindling traditional
crops in the land.
In the early years, the soil was still fertile, cotton pests
hadn't yet found the new crop, and other pests were meeting powerful synthetic
toxins for the first time. It was a win-win situation for farmers.
Then reality reasserted itself.
The pests got hardier and pesticide use spiralled into
cocktails of up to ten chemicals.
Degraded soils could no longer be rescued by artificial
fertilisers. The ecosystem went onto
free-fall under the burden of toxins and absence of food for wildlife.
As input costs escalated, profits plummeted and debts became
unsurmountable. The need for child
labour meant no chance of an education for the next generation, and men, women
and children were sickened by exposure to pesticides. Necessity bred illegal trade. Society went into melt-down. Defeated by their circumstances, suffocating
under mounting debt, on the brink of poverty and watching their
chemical-saturated land falter, the area was a hotbed for farmer suicides.
The only 'solution' their mentors, the dealers, could offer
was more of the same, and the trap closed.
"Pesticide addiction pulled everyone and everything along in a net of interlocking feedback loops and chain-reactions that trussed up both the ecosystem and the social system." (Getting Clean).
Two villages, in areas high-ranking for unrestrained use of
pesticides, have managed to break free.
A combination of desperation, the red hairy caterpillar
(with thick body hair which chemicals can't penetrate, and happy to eat most
crops), a strong-minded, prominent village elder willing to pioneer new farming
methods, and devoted NGOs and scientists, led the villagers to try the
alternative path of 'Non-Pesticide Management' (NPM).
Non-Pesticide Management
(NPM)
A large part of NPM is the
revival of a wide range of traditional methods of pest control, using local,
self-prepared or cheap inputs.
It includes, for example, the
use of the neem tree to repel and starve the pests: neem seeds for the soil,
neem seed infusions for spraying, and neem leaves to protect the harvest. Sadly, the availability of neem is low since
many of the trees have been logged for pulp.
Livestock manure with
earth-worm compost is used to restore the soil.
Villagers report an unexpected boon that the produce from their enriched
soil lasts longer after harvest without spoiling. Sadly, availability of manure is low because
most families have fewer cows than before.
To control soil-borne
pathogens and pests, NPM also uses sticky traps, bonfires and alternative crops
to attract and remove pests, perches in the fields to attract insectivorous
birds, and soil solarisation (in which the soil is covered with a transparent
polyethylene film so the sunlight heats it).
Realising they also needed a market for their produce, an
organic farmers' co-operative was formed, followed by a consumer co-operative
to buy their products directly.
Society, health and the ecosystem were restored.
This really is a win-win situation for the farming
community, and it's sustainable. The
villages are being used as a model for others to follow and are visited by
thousands of farmers a year.
Needless to say the agrichemical dealers are not so
happy. They tried to punish NPM farms by
paying less for their cotton crops, but the formation of the co-operative
market put paid to that. State government
acceptance has now thwarted attempts to block the spread of NPM.
OUR COMMENT
The impact of chemical-dependent agriculture, with which
GMOs are designed to mesh, became very quickly obvious in the small-holder
situation in India: it caused a collapse of health of the environment, of the
society, and of the individuals.
This process is being repeated all over the world, but it's
slower and less obvious because people in developed countries are distanced
from the land.
The story of the two villages in India could, however, be
repeated anywhere in the world.
SOURCES:
- Gerry
Marten and Donna Glee Williams, Getting Clean: Recovering from
pesticide addiction, The Ecologist, 2007
- Gerry
Marten, Models for success in a time of crisis - escaping the Pesticide
Trap: Non-Pesticide Management for Agricultural Pests (Andhra Pradesh, India),
www.ecotippingpoints.org, June 2005
- Jovita
Aranha, Rattled by Farmer Suicides & Health Issues, Telangana
Village Turns 250 Acres Organic!, wwww.thebetterindia.com, 9.04.19
- Soil solarisation, National Committee on Plasticulture Applications in Horticulture India
Photo Creative Commons
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment. All comments are moderated before they are published.