May 2019
In 2012, a rat feeding study on the toxic effects of Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant GM maize sprayed with the herbicide was published [1]. During the experiment, an excess of tumours was observed in treated animals. This unwelcome suggestion of a link to cancer caused panic in the biotech lobby and sparked a controversy which just keeps on simmering [2].
The CRISPR wrecking ball revealed
April 2019
US government information on genome
(gene) editing describes it as a "group of technologies used by
scientists to change an organism's DNA".
The most popular member of this group
is 'Cas9', an enzyme which cuts DNA and can be designed to home in on
a precise location in the genome [1,2]. Recently, a variant of this
enzyme, 'Cas12a', has been developed: this seems to cut in a way that
causes less disturbance at the cut ends of the DNA.
With regard to gene-edited crops, a
team of Chinese scientists took a belated, close look at all
the DNA changes arising in a novel rice model and what part of
the technology caused them.
Insectageddon
April 2019
"... having taken every step science can offer to devitalise the soil and its food that supports him, (man) is now turning his attention to destroying the insect world upon which he is also dependent." ... "... if birds eat insects poisoned by (pesticides) this can kill them - a striking tribute to the intelligence of 'scientists', since birds are our best safeguard against pests." (Easterbrook, 1946)
Green MEP, Molly Cato, describes how
she has lost count of the times she has debated the "Armageddon"
we are inflicting on our environment, only to be met with "patient,
patronising smiles" from fellow MEPs and no action.
The quote above comes from a 1946
article and refers to DDT and other contemporary "powerful
insecticides of which far too little is yet known". The author
goes on to liken those humans intent on spreading pesticides through
their own environment to "schoolboys rat-hunting in a munitions
dump with a flame thrower".
Since then, we've had decades of the
Green Revolution inflicting chemical after chemical on our world, and
now we have GM crops specially designed for greater chemical
applications, and even for producing their own.
Avoiding unwanted genetic baggage
April 2019
The tool of choice for engineering crop
plant DNA (be it transgenesis or gene editing) uses a plant pathogen,
the bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens, as the vector.
Wild-type Agrobacterium
naturally introduces its own DNA into the plant genome for the
purpose of creating a gall (tumour) of plant tissue in which the
bacterium can live. Genetic engineers create a GM Agrobacterium,
has had its gall-inducing DNA removed and replaced with gene-editing
DNA which therefore becomes inserted into the plant instead.
Despite the number of decades
Agrobacterium has been in used for the genetic transformation
of food and feed, and despite the recognition that such DNA insertion
is error-prone, and despite the regulatory need for knowledge of the
exact DNA alterations in the GM crops being assessed, the techniques
for fully documenting the presence of unwanted changes have only
recently become available.
Super-maize with super problems
April 2019
In 2018, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) GMO panel gave a positive opinion on a new five-event stacked GM maize for food and feed use in the EU.
In 2018, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) GMO panel gave a positive opinion on a new five-event stacked GM maize for food and feed use in the EU.
By breeding together five existing GM
variants, the biotech industry has produced a maize which generates
three Bt toxins to kill moths plus three Bt toxins to kill beetles,
and which can be sprayed with extra glyphosate and extra
glufosinate herbicides due to a doubling of the genes conferring
tolerance to both.
It seems the GMO Panel considers
unexplained agronomic changes* in the GM crop to be outside its
remit, even if these could indicate the presence of elements harmful
to human health.
GM with a TwYST
April 2019
In 2012, a long-term rat feeding study
was published investigating the toxicity of Roundup herbicide and a
Roundup-tolerant GM maize, 'NK603' [1,2]. Its results indicated
adverse effects on the kidney and liver (the organs of
detoxification), and early death. Routine examination of the
condition of the animals during the course of the experiment
unexpectedly revealed an excess of palpable tumours. When presented
chronologically, the emergence of tumours and premature death were
clearly accelerated in both the NK603- and Roundup-fed rats. It
was also noted that all the results were hormone- and sex-dependent.
Let's think omnigenics
April 2019
You don't have to look too far to realise that the one, consistent, feature of all the products of GM technology is that they have failed to deliver on their promises.
In 1994, we were informed of an imminent series of world-changing GM crops destined to emerge in five-year leaps. Monsanto Vice President, Robert Fraley, listed 60 plant species which had already been genetically transformed. The first wave of GM crops would be pest-free, weed-free, and virus-proof by 2000. After this we would have GM improved foods on our tables by 2005, followed by pharmaceuticals from the fields by 2010, and finally GM-grown speciality chemicals.
The only limit to what was possible was the imagination of the genetic engineers, but the basis for this five-year leaping GM programme was never questioned, nor explained.
Now, over two decades later, how many of these leaps have actually been leapt?
You don't have to look too far to realise that the one, consistent, feature of all the products of GM technology is that they have failed to deliver on their promises.
In 1994, we were informed of an imminent series of world-changing GM crops destined to emerge in five-year leaps. Monsanto Vice President, Robert Fraley, listed 60 plant species which had already been genetically transformed. The first wave of GM crops would be pest-free, weed-free, and virus-proof by 2000. After this we would have GM improved foods on our tables by 2005, followed by pharmaceuticals from the fields by 2010, and finally GM-grown speciality chemicals.
The only limit to what was possible was the imagination of the genetic engineers, but the basis for this five-year leaping GM programme was never questioned, nor explained.
Now, over two decades later, how many of these leaps have actually been leapt?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)





