May 2012
|
GMO Right2Know march in the USA. Photo Daquella manera on Flickr |
In 1998, the EU
responded to its citizens demands and instituted mandatory labelling
of GM foods. At the time, Monsanto's PR department carried out the
best damage-limitation exercise it could by claiming to agree that
“You have the right to know what you eat,
especially when it's
better ... We believe that
products that come from biotechnology are better and that they should
be labelled”.
Europeans'
right to know what they eat, however, wasn't extended to the animal
products from livestock fed GM feed. The result has been that honest
information about the main source of GM in our food chain remains
dependent on the integrity of individual food suppliers and is,
therefore, patchy.
In
the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can require labelling
of GM foods only if they are considered materially different from
their conventional equivalents. What this means in practice is that
labelling will only ever happen if the biotech industry comes up with
a value-added GM product for which a label will, usefully, broadcast
the 'benefits'. Because the FDA has no budget for safety-testing,
there's zero possibility of labelling on safety grounds. Neither has
the FDA any authority to require labels just because a food has GM
ingredients nor because US citizens want them: effectively, Americans
have a zero right to demand labelling and zero right to know.