August 2013
Commentary
It would be funny
if it wasn't serious.
Big Biotech, Big
Agrichemical and Big Food (more than 50 companies in all) have joined
together to create the biggest ever PR drive to shove GM down our
unwilling throats.
The result?A
freshly hand-picked PR firm (not yet identified), a new front group
(Alliance to Feed the Future),
and a new website (GMOAnswers.com)
inviting you to “join the conversation and ask your questions about
GMOs”.
As the Organic Consumers' Association
points out, the Alliance to Feed the Future (AFF) has “all the
hallmarks of a typical 'astroturf' group. A deceptive-sounding name
designed to create a positive public impression. A sophisticated
public relations plan designed to control and shape the public
discourse. Obfuscation around its main sources of funding. And a
tendency to attack industry critics, create the perception of doubt
regarding previously accepted science, and exploit consumers
legitimate economic fears.”
The launch of GMOAnswers.com was
apparently so newsworthy it was reported in New York Times. Top
marks to the unknown PR company: “Who gets a mention in the Times
these days just for launching a website?” (Organic
Consumers' Association comment).
GMOAnswers.com's goal is "to make information about biotechnology in food and
agriculture easier to understand”. On this site you can “Learn
more about GMO health and safety”, and “get links to safety
data”.
Let's get real:
- Biotech giant, Syngenta, walked out of a real-life 'conversation' on GMOs not very long ago (see GM CROP DECONTAMINATION IN OREGON - August 2013)
- Who's asking for information on “GMO health and safety”? Or access to the 'safety data'? We already know that thorough testing hasn't been done: the data to answer our questions just aren't there.
Actually
things have gone full circle to the UK Government position in the
1990s which was that all you need to do to gain acceptance for GM is
to educate people. But what's changed since then is that distrust of
all things emanating from Big Biotech/Agrichemical/Food is at an all
time high. Just consider that the website which seems to be inviting
you, the consumer, to get information by making it “easier to
access and understand” is actually, according to the AFF
coordinator, aiming to educate 'opinion leaders' including
those in the university sector, professional societies, journalists
and government officials. It seems the impression that Big
Biotech/Agrichemical/Food haven't got quite the stranglehold on
academia, the media and regulators that we thought they had.
Is the established food supply industry
panicking? It may have good cause: consumers are increasingly
rejecting the industrial food and farming system that relies on toxic
pesticides, animal drugs, antibiotics, growth hormones, climate
disrupting nitrate fertilizer and DNA disruption, along with
inhumane, polluting, and disease-ridden factory farms.
Here's a thought:
Why would the most intelligent and
educated sector of people in the world (university academics, the
societies they have formed, and the government they advise) need easy
to understand information on GMOs from industry? That Big
Biotech/Agrichemical/Food think the average consumer is a bit thick
is insulting, but their view of non-commercial (real) scientists is
breathtakingly arrogant.
Here's a
suggestion:
Don't
bother asking GMOAnswers.com anything, all you'll get is slick PR and
cherry-picked platitudes. Britain alone has several excellent,
well-established websites which the New York Times has apparently never noticed.
These are authored by some quite intelligent and educated people
(many of whom are scientists) who have been following the GM issue
and the science for decades. They include:
- GM Watch
- The Institute of Science in Society
- GM Freeze
- GM-free Cymru
- GM Education
- ... and of course, us.
SOURCES:
- Andrew Pollack, Seeking Support, Biotech Food Companies Pledge Transparency, New York Times, 29.07.13
- Katherine Paul and Zack Kaldveer, Wining our Hears and Minds@ Monsanto and Bit Food Pull out the Big Guns, Organic Consumers Association, 1.08.13
- We answer your questions about GMOs, www.GMOAnswers.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment. All comments are moderated before they are published.