Photo Creative Commons |
Most of the livestock which provide us
with our meat, dairy and eggs are fed maize, soya and cotton seed.
Most of these three crops are liberally sprayed with glyphosate
because they've been genetically transformed to accumulate this
weedkiller.
Livestock aren't the only animals
eating GM crops. Bees can forage over several miles, and
monocultures of GM maize, soya, cotton, and oilseed rape in flower
provide a bees' banquet. Hardly surprising then that American honey
is ubiquitously contaminated with the herbicide.
Less easy to explain is the detection
of glyphosate in organic products where the use of any chemicals is
forbidden. Yet 'organic' bagels and bread were contaminated,
glyphosate levels in some 'organic cage-free' eggs were higher than
regulators allow, and 'organic mountain honey' has measurable levels
of the herbicide.
Where this contamination could be
coming from is a mystery, but organic fields and pastures are as
subject to spray drift from careless neighbours as any other areas,
and the herbicide can persist in the soil for more than 20 years
after the obligatory organic conversion time.
And drink? Most potable water is
treated remove phosphates which will generally remove glyphosate at
the same time. But Germans were recently shocked to discover their
beer is unaccountably laced with the herbicide [1]. In America, ten
out of ten wine samples tested positive for glyphosate. These
included organic and biodynamic wine samples although at much lower
levels. Vines will be killed if sprayed with glyphosate, but it's
common to spray the ground on either side of them, inevitably
contaminating the stems. The herbicide could also be seeping through
to the vine roots from the sprayed areas so close by.
Concerns have already been raised by
science that, although glyphosate penetration directly into the skin
is low, the amounts absorbed increase with exposure time, and
compromised skin has impaired resistance to the chemical [2]. No one
seems to have tested how vulnerable to glyphosate ingress the
membranes of intimate areas might be. The last place you'd want to
find the herbicide is in gauze dressings and swabs, panty-liners,
tampons and sanitary pads. All these products are in protracted
close contact with the body surfaces and all have tested positive for
glyphosate or its metabolite, 'AMPA'.
The manufacturers of feminine hygiene
products insist their products are "proven safe" and that
they use "only materials respecting all the safety criteria".
However, since glyphosate was declared "probably carcinogenic
to humans" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in
2015 [3], their proofs and criteria may be out of date.
With all that glyphosate in food, drink
and just about anything cotton, it's no surprise that in tests (not,
of course carried out by regulators), 93% of Americans and 43.9%
of Europeans were found to have the herbicide in their urine.
Contaminated Americans were, on average, excreting three times the
glyphosate recorded in Europeans, and American children had the
highest levels of all.
The US Food and Drug Administration has
been taking steps for many years to proactively address consumer
concerns about pesticide residues. Its Total Diet Study, on-going
since 1961, monitors 800 contaminants and nutrients in the American
diet in 280 kinds of foods and beverages from around the country four
times a year. Until earlier this year, it steadfastly avoided
testing for glyphosate because it was considered so safe [4], but has
now relented.
OUR COMMENT
Yes folks, another regulatory
don't-look-don't-see policy to keep the biotech industry afloat and
GM crops in the ground, no matter what the cost to public health.
The result is that "100% American" now means 100%
glyphosate-contaminated, "100% natural" now means
glyphosate-contaminated because there's nothing else to be found,
and "100% pure" now means, for example, pure honey plus
pure glyphosate.
Since there's no doubt you're being
exposed to a probable carcinogen, you have every reason and right to
demand it is removed from your food and environment. At the same
time, consider demanding that it isn't replaced
by another, even more toxic, herbicide [5].
Background
[1] GLYPHOSATE-FEST - April 2016
[2] GLYPHOSATE THROUGH YOUR SKIN - April 2015
[3] GLYPHOSATE ISA PROBABLE CARCINOGEN - May 2015
[4] GLYPHOSATE: SAFE AS SALT
- (DOC) GMFS ARCHIVE, February 2009
[5] SPOTLIGHT ONSPRAY-DRIFT - September 2016
SOURCES:
- Carey Gillam, Private Tests Show Cancer-Linked Herbicide in Breakfast Foods; FDA mum on its assessments, The Huffington Post, 19.04.16
- Carey Gillam, FDA Finds Monsanto's Weedkiller in U.S. Honey, The Huffington Post, 15.09.16
- Dr. Mercola, Not Even Your Organic Wine Is Safe From Monsanto, www.mercola.com, 12.04.16
- Tampons, sanitary pads, and sterile gauze contaminated with probable carcinogen glyphosate, The Detox Project, http://detoxproject.org, 21.10.15
- Paul Wright, Organic panty liners recalled for containing traces of weedkiller found in Monsanto products, www.ibtimes.co.uk, 25.02.16
- UCSF Presentation Reveals Glyphosate contamination in People Across America, Organic Consumers Association, 25.05.16
I would like to know how many Scottish farmers feed their animals soya or corn, because if they do it is almost certain they are GMO crops imported from the US or Argentina. Most if not all (I hope all) farmers on Orkney do not use these feeds and feed their animals home grown silage and barley. I have heard of some Orkney farmers using glyphosate as a dessicator. This practice should be banned. If animal feed contains glyphosate inevitably it will end up in our bodies.
ReplyDelete