Not content with Nature's measured pace for adjusting the
genome to suit the ecosystem, the environment and the future, genetic engineers
have devised a way to force GMOs to add an extra copy of artificial DNA into
their offspring. This creates a
mutagenic chain reaction which drives the artificial DNA progressively into
subsequent generations.
The 'gene-drive' is based on a bacterial genome-editing
technique described by GM-free Scotland before - CRISPR-Cas9 [1]. 'Cas9' is an enzyme which cuts DNA, while the
'CRISPR' part is a homing device to anchor the Cas9 to the desired bit of the
genome. In a gene-drive, the CRISPR-Cas9
stays where it is in the genome and carries on mutating the genome of the
wild-type mate during reproduction to produce nothing but mutated offspring.
This means that what genetic engineers can do now is
population engineering, and if applied to wild populations this is ecological
engineering.
Self-copying genes rampaging through a population seem to
many (even scientists) akin to a highly virulent molecular plague. Indeed, lots of clever technical tricks have
been proposed to control gene-drive organisms once released: for example, installing
a need for two interacting drives; or drives which are switched on or off by
the presence of a chemical. As a last
resort, another wave of GM organisms could be released with gene-drives to cut
out the one causing the problem in the first place.
Like all GM techniques, CRISPR-Cas9 will have unpredictable
effects on the functioning and evolution of the genome.
COMMENT. The engineered genome will also have
unpredictable effects on the functioning and evolution of the species, and the
engineered population will have unpredictable effects on the functioning and
evolution of the ecosystem (and that includes humans). With a "near certainty of spread across
political borders" (Esvelt), there will also be unpredictable effects on
international relations. Marvelous.
Gene drives are only useful, of course, if the organism to
be changed breeds very rapidly, and one of the easiest things to achieve with
genetic engineering is annihilation.
Suitable candidates, therefore, include many pests, diseases, and invasive
species (especially those threatening to wipe out endangered species).
Also, since the technique is readily available to "any
malign individual or organisation with access to modern laboratory
equipment", the scope for the manufacture of self-driving biological
weapons is limitless.
So far, attention has centred on reversing the resistance to
weedkillers and insecticides created by GM crops in the first place. In other words, gene-drives are a neat means
to perpetuate business-as-usual for the biotech industry.
High-profile in the media has been the most likely first
target for gene-drive technology: wiping out disease-carrying mosquitoes or
rendering them unable to transmit the pathogen [2].
OUR COMMENT
There won't be any such thing as a natural or artificial
'refuge' in which non-gene-driven organisms can survive and dilute out emerging
mutants: catastrophic destabilisation of ecosystems is a real possibility.
Worse, the danger that the artificial DNA is unstable or
causes instabilities elsewhere in the genome is very real: whatever it mutates
into will then be driven through future generations. The vision, as presented by one Nature
Magazine senior reporter, is of wild GM populations accumulating gene-driven
mutations in their artificial DNA from generation to generation. Rather than controlling pests and pathogens,
the GM cure could prove worse than the disease.
Gene drive technology shouldn't be released into the
environment for the same reason that man-made radio-active materials in any
form shouldn't be there either.
Don't sit back and let nasty gene-driven surprises creep up
on you.
Background:
[2] ZIKA AND
SUPER-ZIKA - April 2016
SOURCES
- Kevin Esvelt, et al., 2014, concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations, eLifesciences.org
- James E. DiCarlo, RNA-guided gene drives can efficiently bias inheritance in wild yeast, Cold Springs Laboratory, 16.01.15
- Outsmarting Nature: Synthetic Biology and "Climate Smart" Agriculture, Heinrich Böll Foundation, November 2015
- Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, CRISPR Too Fast for Comfort, Institute of Science in Society Report 12.01.16
- Driving test, Nature 524 6.08.15
- Heidi Ledford, Caution urged over DNA editing in wild, Nature 524 6.08.15
- Omar S. Akbari, et al., Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory, Science Magazine, 30.07.15
- Steve Connor, 'Gene drive' Scientists sound alarm over supercharged GM organisms which could spread in the wild and cause environmental disasters, Independent 2.08.15
- Sharon Begley, Gene drive gives scientists power to hijack evolution, STAT 17.1115
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment. All comments are moderated before they are published.