Several experiments have now indicated
direct harm to humans from Roundup herbicide, widely sprayed on GM crops.
Photo from Creative Commons |
For example, risks to blood-, testicular-,
umbilical-, embryonic- and placental-cells have been demonstrated. Effects of Roundup on cells of the liver and
kidney (our major organs of detoxification), and endocrine disruption have been
indicated. And the list continues to
grow.
Glyphosate, the active herbicidal
ingredient of Roundup, has undergone extensive safety testing, and has been
declared safer than other such agri-chemicals.
However, Roundup formulations, in which
glyphosate is quantitatively a minor constituent, have not been tested. This is despite Roundup containing a variety
of (sometimes secret) ingredients designed to increase glyphosate's ability to
penetrate into cells and kill them.
Experiments designed to distinguish between
the effects of glyphosate and Roundup are in good agreement that Roundup is
much more harmful than its herbicidal component alone [1].
To try to clarify just how Roundup could be
inflicting harm, a research team in Argentina had a look at what was going on
inside the cells exposed to it.
Like others before them, the Argentinean
scientists used a well-established human cell-culture model. This approach isolates the effects of the
substance being tested from bodily processes, such as digestion, tissue
distribution, metabolism and excretion, which complicate the picture. The cells chosen for the study were derived
from human liver as this organ plays a key role in dealing with dietary toxins.
The team found no ill-effects from a
24-hour exposure to glyphosate at concentrations of one-hundredth of
recommended agricultural usage levels.
Exposure to glyphosate's main break-down product, 'AMPA', triggered an
increase in one biomarker for detoxification.
In contrast, Roundup formula caused the cells to generate 'reactive
oxygen species' which are known damage proteins, DNA and fats. Roundup also induced increases in biomarkers
for oxidative stress, nitrosative stress, detoxification, and programmed cell
death (a protective mechanism).
The authors concluded that they had
“clearly demonstrated” toxic reactions in their liver cells at sub-agricultural
concentrations of Roundup. A risk to
agricultural workers and rural populations is inescapable, and further
investigation of the effects of chronic exposure to Roundup is needed.
OUR COMMENT
Long-term health effects in habitual
consumers of GM foods designed to accumulate Roundup can't be ruled out, except
by doing the science.
How many worrisome preliminary studies like
this one have to be published before further, more sophisticated and targeted,
investigations of Roundup's effect on human health are carried out?
Ask for more GM food safety testing.
Background:
[1] ROUNDUP IS NOT SAFE TO EAT - March 2013
SOURCES
- Gabriela Chaufan, et al., 2014, Glyphosate Commercial Formulation Causes /Cytotoxicity, Oxidative Effects, and Apoptosis on Human Cells: Differences With its Active Ingredient, International Journal of Toxicology
- Céline Gasnier, et al., 2011, defined plant extracts can protect human cells against combined xenobiotic effects, Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 6:3
- A. Martínez, et al., 2007, Cytotoxicity of the herbicide glyphosate in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, Biomedica 27(4)
- Glyphosate/Roundup & Human Male Infertility, Institute of Science in Society Report, 19.03.14
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment. All comments are moderated before they are published.